On Friday 10 June 2005 09:37, zgrim wrote: > On [10-06-2005] 08:35 +0300, Mihai Maties wrote: > > > 1. de ce e recomandat aptitude in loc de apt-get? > > > > Pentru ca aptitude rezolva mai bine dependintele decat apt-get. > > "The recommended tool for upgrading between Debian GNU/Linux releases is > to use the package management tool aptitude. This tool makes safer > decisions about package installations than running apt-get directly." > > "Safer decisions" _nu inseamna_ ca "rezolva mai bine dependintele".
In Release Notes, la sectiunea "2.1. What's new in the distribution?" scrie, citez: <--- cut here ---> The sarge version of `aptitude' is the preferred program for package management from console. It has proven to be better at dependency resolution than `apt-get'. `aptitude' supports most command line operations of `apt-get'. </--- cut here ---> > Imo, sistemul se controleaza cel mai bine cu apt, wrapperul numit > aptitude baga o gramada de porcarii inutile; evident, trebuie sa stii ce > faci, deci ymmv. Sunt de acord insa, ca pentru masa larga de > utilizatori, sa fie recomandat in doace a fi folosit aptitude. Nu am > fost insa incantat de formularea "rezolva mai bine dependintele". Atat. Nu scrie nicaieri ce inteleg ei prin "safer decisions" deci nu pot trage o concluzie clara. Dar din citatul pe care l-am dat eu si cel pe care l-ai dat tu tind sa cred ca pentru ei "safer decisions" ~=~ "better dependency resolution". Mihai -- This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/ --- Detalii despre listele noastre de mail: http://www.lug.ro/
