My modifications to the *.vm templates fix JavaScript and CSS issues - should those go in 2.3 or 2.4?
Here's what the theme looks like (but with the header graphic from http://raibledesigns.com/page/rd?catname=%2FThe+Bus, sans logo): http://virtuastravels.com/page/road Matt On 5/9/06, David M Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 9, 2006, at 5:24 PM, Allen Gilliland wrote: > Matt Raible wrote: >> On 5/8/06, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> = >>> >> Also, I'd like to contribute a version of my new theme to Roller. >>> >> Should I simple check it into "themes" or should it go into the >>> >> support project? >>> > >>> > If the new theme does not use LGPL, then I'd vote for Roller >>> "themes" >>> >>> Actually, I vote for support project. Unless this is going to be >>> one of >>> the few themes that we ship with the default Roller package. >> I'm ready to check this theme in, along with some fixes for: >> website.vm >> navbar.vm >> comments.vm >> weblog.vm > > that stuff can go into trunk as long as Dave has the 2.3 branch/tag > prepared and it won't disrupt the 2.3 release stuff. I'll create a branch for 2.3 tonight so that dev can continue in trunk. I'll send out a note when I'm done. - Dave
