OK, I've created an issue for this and will try to work on it in the coming weeks.
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/roller/browse/ROL-1131 Matt On 5/10/06, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David M Johnson wrote: > > On May 9, 2006, at 10:21 PM, Matt Raible wrote: >>> Hmmm... I think we should consider that for 2.4. However, I don't >>> like the idea of introducing another comment form macro. We already >>> have two (regular and twisty-style) and we should really have just >>> one. Can we change the existing comment form macro to make it CSS >>> compliant/friendly instead? >> >> Yes. We can certainly do this. However, it might be somewhat tedious >> to make sure it works across all the themes. > > It would definitely be an improvement. Many of the themes have no > styling around the comment form and fields at all, so we'd probably only > have to make corrections the couple nice themes that we have. And, > maintaining multiple comment forms is going to be more tedious in the > long run. I agree, we can't add another comments form macro so we need to fix up the existing one. > > >> Should I enter a bug for >> it? It'd be nice to figure out a fix for the twisty-style comments as >> well, but I'm also open to bagging it altogether since it doesn't work >> with the authenticators (unless we can call them using XHR). > > I removed twisty comments from the themes last year when we ran into > problems with it, so I'm certainly not opposed to dropping it. whoot! +1 on dropping extra macro junk! -- Allen > > - Dave >
