Although I am not strictly against it, Timo raises some valid points.
Also if we do this, what would the default build option be? (neutral/slightly skeptic about this) K. Dne 8.3.2012 1:27, Timo Kreuzer napsal(a):
Am I the only one against that? Tests are tests, not reactos. Why do I need to have another bazillion files in my source tree that I don't need or want? I have ONE checkout of rostests, but a dozen checkouts of reactos. For amd64 work I even disabled build of a lot of stuff that was pointless. Now even more stuff spread thoughout the whole tree? Possibly even built by default? Deleting a full reactos checkout is already slow enough. Also every commit to rostetsts is a possible build breaker and can cause massive rebuilds. Configure time will also increase. I would rather prefer to make it even more modular, instead of mixing stuff even more. -1 _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
