+1 for keeping rostests separate +1 for even more modularity also i wish we would use/exploit the svn externals feature whenever possible instead of importing 3rd party code into our repo
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Sylvain Petreolle <spetreo...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > I fully agree with Timo. > We don't need to have useless files in tree. > Remember we recently deleted stuff from the main tree for the same reasons : > space used and download time. > > We do need tests, they are critical, but not in every reactos checkout. > I am for making tests a complete separated project, which would lower build > times even more. > > Kind regards, > Sylvain Petreolle > > ________________________________ > De : Timo Kreuzer <timo.kreu...@web.de> > À : ReactOS Development List <ros-dev@reactos.org> > Envoyé le : Jeudi 8 mars 2012 1h27 > Objet : Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [jgardou] 56082: [DAMN_IT] - addendum to > r56081 > > Am I the only one against that? > Tests are tests, not reactos. > Why do I need to have another bazillion files in my source tree that I don't > need or want? > I have ONE checkout of rostests, but a dozen checkouts of reactos. For amd64 > work I even disabled build of a lot of stuff that was pointless. Now even > more stuff spread thoughout the whole tree? Possibly even built by default? > Deleting a full reactos checkout is already slow enough. Also every commit > to rostetsts is a possible build breaker and can cause massive rebuilds. > Configure time will also increase. > I would rather prefer to make it even more modular, instead of mixing stuff > even more. > > -1 > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev@reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev@reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
