(I saw the other replies as well; due to their length it may take me a while to read through them.)
Emanuel Rumpf wrote: > 2008/10/9 Matthew Woehlke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> My problem with moving away from KDE is that a: it means I can't work on >> KDE integration (which is what I probably would have been most >> interested in), >> > Could you describe a little, what desktop integration means > to you (or KDE), please?! I'm not clear about it. Well, the main thing I'd likely be interested in is integration with KDE's color scheme. (I'd also like to see Qt pick up more of it, but that seems unlikely, at least in the short term.) But there are other possibilities; imagine opening a document with a few staves of music and clicking on it, and up pops RG! (I think KOffice already has something for music editing, but I think it's young, and therefore not likely to be as featureful.) There's also little things, like getting Oxygen (or whatever theme is in use) icons cheaply, KDE standard actions, etc. And, honestly, there's an extent to which I can't answer that. Maybe, in the end I'll decide I don't care, but knowing that people aren't dead-set against it helps a lot :-). > Is being a KDE app the only way to integrate it into the KDE desktop ? Technically, you can /always/ implement the same functionality yourself, it's just a lot more work. -- Matthew ENOWIT: .sig file for this machine not set up yet ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
