On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 15:45:58 +0200 Lorenzo Sutton <lorenzofsut...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > ... > The key question, though, is: would it make sense to support LV2 if then > user's aren't able to 'generate' (i.e. save as, say, a WAV file), the > final result of their musical masterpiece made in Rosegarden? 1 I've been using jack_capture (just # jack_capture is the command) to save RG replay as .wav file 2 If carla really is a dssi plugin-manager supporting just about everything then I'm all for it (but I don't know how to load it into RG as a plugin itself, can't find much user guidance for carla, and carla seems unavailable on Devuan for example). 3 prad asked at one point if standalone/plugin. I found this: https://www.rosegardenmusic.com/doc/en/studio-plugins.html "Using a synth plugin gives you somewhat better control and repeatability than using an external MIDI device, because Rosegarden will be able to load the correct plugins for you and use the correct settings the next time you load your same file. Plugins may also offer better timing resolution than external MIDI devices, and synth plugin instruments have the advantage of being routable like audio instruments, which also means you can add effects plugins on top of them." I presume that *external MIDI devices* refers to standalone hardware OR soft synths? If plying a project through many consecutive sessions to get it done then the plugin settings being saved and reloaded each time is a distinct and huge benefit from my point of view. _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
