On 4 Nov 2012, george greenfield <[email protected]> wrote: > In message <33bcd1e752.old_coaster@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk> > Tony Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
[snip] > > Sorry, please disregard the message above. It was trapped, in the > > queue, when my laptop hibernated during a power-cut. It flew away, > > unnoticed, when I revisited the same laptop, during another > > power-cut, today. [snip OT, to avoid the traffic police...] > Sorry not to get back to you earlier, Tony: because of your home > address (I suspect) my PC email software made strenuous efforts to > persuade me that your message should be ignored! It also inserted '[SUSPICIOUS MESSAGE]' into the subject line of your response (which I have now removed). Maybe you didn't see my 'intended' response on 31 Oct 2012, as follows: On 31 Oct 2012, george greenfield <[email protected]> wrote: [snip] > I favour the 'ain't bust, don't need fixing' approach to upgrades, but > in this case, of course, it (Photodesk) is bust. If I could be sure > that upgrading to 5.19 would persuade it to work, I would do it. I > understand also that 5.19 offers benefits over preceding 5.xx versions > such as networking and internet (but not HD4 support)? I can confirm that RPCEmu089/519 offers networking and internet. As you say, it does not support IDE HD4 but, for me, that is not an issue since HostFS works perfectly well, in its stead. To try 5.19, at zero risk, I would suggest that you make a backup copy of the entire RPCEmu folder, in Program Files. If the 5.19 upgrade is successful, well and good. If the 5.19 upgrade fails, you can revert to the backup. Nothing to lose! Tony _______________________________________________ Rpcemu mailing list [email protected] http://www.riscos.info/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rpcemu
