dmnks left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#3658)

> I'll note that we should assess the potential breakage from this change 
> before committing too deeply for 6.1. These files classify as rpm internal 
> affairs and packages making assumptions are kinda asking for trouble, and 
> _some_ breakage is inevitable I think. But we also just said we're done 
> breaking s**t for a while in 
> [#4009](https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/4009) 😆

Yep, tried to asses this in #3644 and there is potential breakage in some 
packages, including the kernel 😅

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3658#issuecomment-3420978636
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3658/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to