> -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Xiaoliang Zhao [mailto:xleonz...@gmail.com] > 发送时间: 2010年1月28日 12:14 > 收件人: Xu Xiaohu > 抄送: Tony Li; RRG > 主题: Re: [rrg] A concern with ILNP//re: critique of RANGI > > IMHO, > > > However, when the ILNP host changes its locator during communicating with > a > > > is not a mobile host, but a fixed host located in a multi-homed site > > is it a big concern? or in many cases, we just hang up and > redial/refresh page again?
If so easy, then what's the meaning/motivation for Mobile IP? > or transport layer (TCP) can be changed a > bit to do a better job to use identifier? I just don't see it as a > critical issue to ILNP... Binding transport associations to identifiers is a better choice. However, like the home addresses in Mobile IP, the ILNP identifiers should also be routable in the Internet so as to allow the packets with destination being identifier to be forwarded to some home-agent like device. Then what's the business model for deploying such home-agent like devices based on the fact that the ILNP identifiers are flat. In addition, since the ILNP identifiers are not required to be globally unique, routing based on such identifiers in Internet is almost impossible. Xiaohu _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
