Hi, Joel, Perhaps a more direct question might serve here:
o How has ILNP solved the problem of the DFZ routing table explosion? On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Joel M. Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com>wrote: > I do not see the difficulty. We already have the IPv6 mechanisms to > advertise the prefixes. And we have the IPv6 mechanisms for hosts to > combne the prefixes with teir IDs. > We also have the dynamic DNS mechanisms (with security) needed to > advertise the results. > > With ILP, these combinations can be changed during sessions, and traffic > can change paths during sessions without impact. > With the current architecture, sessions can not change paths, and changes > to the connectivity are hard to discover or utilize. > > Thee are other multi-homing problems that are not solved. Working out how > to manage prefix assignments in an enterprise when external assignments > change is one example of such issues (LISP takes a different tack, and thus > the costs and benefits are different.) > > Yours, > Joel > -- DY
_______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
