On 9/2/07, Wilson Bilkovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/1/07, rupert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 1 Sep 2007, at 10:04, Tom Stuart wrote: > > > > > On 1 Sep 2007, at 09:31, rupert wrote: > > >>> Are we planning on dumping the mock framework in favor of using > > >>> Mocha > > >> The idea has been bandied around on the dev list recently > > This decision, if it is made in this manner, is suicide for RSpec. > I have been a huge RSpec booster, but this will make me drop it like a hot > coal. > =( > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
Eh! The first reactions :-) However I also have to admit and wonder why rspec dev didn't make this kind of decisions before version 1.0. I hate (as a nuby) that now I have to make decision (mocka or flexmock) at the time where I'm not even a big mock fan yet (now it's even more harder to sell the idea to co-workers as well). For the very first look, I prefer mocka syntax more than flexmock. However I like rspec's clean it 'should' specs (and generating doc from it) so much more compared to test::unit way is. Oki, Priit _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
