Eric, Minqui and Curtis: +1 on interest. Whether we get a IETF room or not - I'd like to really chat about this topic.
Sue -----Original Message----- From: Eric Osborne (eosborne) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 6:53 AM To: Mingui Zhang; Tony Li; [email protected] Cc: Susan Hares; [email protected] Subject: RE: PANET side-meeting Will this side meeting be in Orlando? I'm sceptical of some of the current approaches but am very interested in where they might go. eric > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Mingui Zhang > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 2:10 AM > To: Tony Li; [email protected] > Cc: Susan Hares; [email protected] > Subject: PANET side-meeting > > Hi Tony and Curtis, > > Let me retrospect some history to clear up the chaos floating around. > > On Feb 4th, I organized a conference call among a dozen of guys (from > operators, vendors and Universities) who are interested in PANET, in order to > prepare for a side meeting in IETF. There was a rough consensus that a side- > meeting is a good way to call for interest, coordination and contribution to > PANET. However, requests was _prematurely_ sent out afterwards, without > including all the effort from the conference attendees. I hope this email can > get > us back on track. So I change its title. > > I believe the most efficient way for us is to play the game according to the > rule > of IETF/IRTF. Therefore, we are trying to find a place to accommodate the > side- > meeting. We should not delve into discussion of specific solutions before we > make clear the problem scope. A charter should be published, which will help > us figure out what is the problem we are trying to solve. Before that, let me > add some pointers of drafts from my side. I believe these drafts can also help > people to figure out the scope of PANET. > Power-Aware Networks (PANET): Problem Statement, > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-panet-problem-statement/ > Use Cases for Power-Aware Networks, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft- > zhang-panet-use-cases/ > Requirements for Power Aware Network, > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-panet-requirement/ > > On the 84th IETF rtgwg f2f meeting, there were two presentations relevant to > greening. I also list them as follows FYI. > A Framework and Requirements for Energy Aware Control Planes, > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-retana-rtgwg-eacp-00, [slides] > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-rtgwg-3.pptx > Power-aware Routing and Traffic Engineering: Requirements, Approaches, and > Issues, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhang-greennet/, [slides] > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/slides/slides-84-rtgwg-4.pptx > > Thanks, > Mingui Zhang > Huawei Technologies > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > >Of Tony Li > >Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 7:02 AM > >To: [email protected] > >Cc: Shankar Raman M J; [email protected] > >Subject: Re: Power aware networks : Comments requested from routing > >community > > > > > >On Feb 7, 2013, at 2:44 PM, Curtis Villamizar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I don't think this is even material ready for IRTF consideration, but > >> that is up to Tony and IRTF to decide. > > > > > >As always, the IRTF does not require well-formed ideas as a > >pre-requisite for starting work. Instead, there needs to be a clear > >problem statement (i.e., a > >charter) and a sufficient group of serious researchers who are > >committed to following through in a committed manner. > > > >Note that it is, by definition, research. It is expected to have a > >non-trivial likelihood of failure. > > > >Regards, > >Tony > > > >_______________________________________________ > >rtgwg mailing list > >[email protected] > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
