Dear chairs and the WG,
I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thank you. Best Regards, Rui Zhuang ----Original Message---- From："zhuangrui" <[email protected]> To："yingzhen.ietf" <[email protected]>,rtgwg <[email protected]>,rtgwg-chairs <[email protected]>,draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement <[email protected]>,fantel <[email protected]> Date：2026-01-19 16:09:46 Subject：[rtgwg] Re: Call for adoption:draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-03 Hi all, I support the adoption of this draft. From a network operator's perspective, this draft clearly points out the weaknesses of existing notification mechanisms, especially for emerging scenarios such as AI/ML/data center networks. This draft provides the necessary foundation for the discussion of subsequent solutions. Best Regards, Rui Zhuang From: Yingzhen Qu via Datatracker Date: 2026-01-16 03:12 To: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Subject: [fantel] Call for adoption: draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-03 (Ends 2026-01-30) This message starts a rtgwg WG Call for Adoption of: draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-03 This Working Group Call for Adoption ends on 2026-01-30 Abstract: Modern networks require adaptive traffic manipulation including Traffic Engineering (TE), load balancing, flow control, and protection, to support high-throughput, low-latency, and lossless applications such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) /Machine Learning (ML) training and real-time services. A good and timely understanding of network operational status, such as congestion and failures, can help to improve network utilization, enable the selection of paths with reduced latency, and enable faster response to critical events. This document describes the existing problems and why a new set of fast network notification solutions are needed. Please reply to this message and indicate whether or not you support adoption of this Internet-Draft by the rtgwg WG. Comments to explain your preference are greatly appreciated. Please reply to all recipients of this message and include this message in your response. Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [2]. Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any. Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be found at [3]. Thank you. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/ [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/ [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/ The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement/ There is also an HTMLized version available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-03 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-dong-fantel-problem-statement-03 _______________________________________________ fantel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
