>Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 14:23:55 +0200
>From: Paolo Mantegazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [rtl] RTAI and RTLinux
>
>...
>
>Once more RTAI has no problem in doing that. RTAI fifos were already
>based on the use of its srqs when RTL was still patching the kernel to
>protect Linux tasks queues to be used with fifos in real time.
Am I wrong, or RTAI was based on RTL? This sounds like someone here
is spitting in the wind. (Or, assuming it will make as much sense in
english as it does in portuguese: one is spitting on the plate that
oneself's eating from)
>...
>So I was just pleased to have them add, and copyright, what I think is
>an usefull service for RTAI. ...
"COPYRIGHT"??!! What kind of copyright? A GPL, I presume.
But then again, copyright what??!! These things (ideas) are older than
the bible -- or maybe even older than the first draft of the book of
Genesis. ;-)
Now I remember why I unsubscribe this list a year ago.
Isn't that about time we had one single RT-LINUX, or whatever
you want to call it?
A year went by, and there are still threads like this one. Titled
"RTAI and RTLinux" or "RTAI vs. RTLinux".
How about getting a Nobel Prize, a lot of people in this list will
get a Nobel Prize, alright. But first, the Nobel Foundation have to
start awarding people for re-inventing the wheel.
gnd
-------------< G. N. DeSouza >-------------
---------< [EMAIL PROTECTED]>---------
--< http://rvl1.ecn.purdue.edu/~gnelson >--
-- [rtl] ---
To unsubscribe:
echo "unsubscribe rtl" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR
echo "unsubscribe rtl <Your_email>" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
For more information on Real-Time Linux see:
http://www.rtlinux.org/rtlinux/
