On 3 sep, 21:01, Aldric Giacomoni <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Well, just remember that Rails is a web framework, and Ruby is (as has
> been mentioned) an interpreted language.
> If speed matters, then you need to go as low in the language hierarchy
> as possible. And usually when you talk about going low, you mean C... As
> I was reminded here, though, bits of Ruby gems are written in C,
> precisely for speed reasons :)

That helps :)

>
> And if every millisecond counts, then yes, you probably want to control
> everything, and that means email is probably also the wrong way to go.
> You'll probably want to send your own messages through your own
> interface. I did not test this and I can be wrong, but it may be faster
> to just send one TCP packet with a code which gets translated to a real
> message when it gets to the recipient. Again .. Speed vs. Flexibility :)

We don't control the recipient and we have to send an e-mail. It might
change, but it won't for the forseeable future.

>
> Good luck, and remember to share what you learned.. If you can't share
> the code ;-)

I will share what I can share, but if I don't use Rails, I probably
won't be sharing it here ;)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby 
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to