On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Jim Burgess <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> In that case I would be grateful if someone could tell me: > Is this a realistic thing to do? > Or, is it a silly idea which goes against some principle of Rails 3? I can't answer either of those directly, but -- you previously said: > The only problem is, that although this works on my machine, my > colleague (for whatever reason) refuses to install any additional gems > on his machine (I guess this is why he wrote his own paginator in the > first place). What happens when you want to add a feature that requires adding a different gem? Is he going to write his own version of that too? Or when an existing gem needs an update? > My question: is it possible using rails 3.0.3, to unpack ONLY the > will_paginate gem to my vendor directory, so that it will work in the > project without my colleague having to install it? > > I tried "bundle install vendor/gems", but this installs everything to > this directory. 1) So install everything in vendor/gems and be done with it; how is that a problem? Or, 2) Install everything, delete what you don't want, and commit the one gem you need. Done. Or, 3) Find a new, saner colleague to work with :-) FWIW, -- Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroe...@gmail.com http://about.me/hassanschroeder twitter: @hassan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.