On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Jim Burgess <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> In that case I would be grateful if someone could tell me:
> Is this a realistic thing to do?
> Or, is it a silly idea which goes against some principle of Rails 3?
I can't answer either of those directly, but -- you previously said:
> The only problem is, that although this works on my machine, my
> colleague (for whatever reason) refuses to install any additional gems
> on his machine (I guess this is why he wrote his own paginator in the
> first place).
What happens when you want to add a feature that requires adding
a different gem? Is he going to write his own version of that too? Or
when an existing gem needs an update?
> My question: is it possible using rails 3.0.3, to unpack ONLY the
> will_paginate gem to my vendor directory, so that it will work in the
> project without my colleague having to install it?
>
> I tried "bundle install vendor/gems", but this installs everything to
> this directory.
1) So install everything in vendor/gems and be done with it; how is
that a problem? Or,
2) Install everything, delete what you don't want, and commit the one
gem you need. Done. Or,
3) Find a new, saner colleague to work with :-)
FWIW,
--
Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.schroe...@gmail.com
http://about.me/hassanschroeder
twitter: @hassan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
