On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Patrick Walton <pwal...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> I don't see the things you mention as warts. They're just consequences of, > well, having methods in the OO sense. Nearly all of these "warts" show up > in other object-oriented languages too. Maybe they're warts of > object-oriented programming in general and illustrate that OO is a bad > idea, but as I mentioned before Rust is designed to support OO. > OO for me was always more tied in with virtual methods than with how methods are scoped. But either way - I think this is basically my view. :) The only part of it I like is dot syntax. -- Your ship was destroyed in a monadic eruption.
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list Rust-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
