open() feels like the clear winner here. Channel::new_pipe is annoying because it's long and because channels and pipes are different things ( http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pipe_flow),
And aren't we down to naming? I thought the design sounded mostly settled from the last conversation, and brson revived the thread specifically responding to a question about naming. On Thursday, January 23, 2014, Tony Arcieri <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Benjamin Striegel <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> And Chan::open() doesn't map to anything that's as intuitive. >> > > Like File::open? :P > > -- > Tony Arcieri >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
