Also, +1 for source and sink, I still get port and channel mixed up. On Thursday, January 23, 2014, Jason Fager <[email protected]> wrote:
> open() feels like the clear winner here. Channel::new_pipe is annoying > because it's long and because channels and pipes are different things ( > http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pipe_flow), > > And aren't we down to naming? I thought the design sounded mostly settled > from the last conversation, and brson revived the thread specifically > responding to a question about naming. > > > > On Thursday, January 23, 2014, Tony Arcieri <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Benjamin Striegel < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> And Chan::open() doesn't map to anything that's as intuitive. >>> >> >> Like File::open? :P >> >> -- >> Tony Arcieri >> >
_______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
