John, I agree and now understand why you're having them made up. I knew it had to be more than the .001 difference in width of the tread. As has been said, thanks for posting the photos and pushing us old farts towards a more scale looking model.
Butch --- In [email protected], "John Degnan" <Scaler164@...> wrote: > > Hi Butch, > > Code 87 (P:64) wheels require precision, PROTO-scale trackwork. Code 88 > wheels do not, and should operate fine on most of the readily-available > turnouts on the market such as Shinohara, Tomalco Track, Railway Engineering, > and those made with a Fast Tracks jig... and look 100 times better in the > process. > > > John Degnan > Scaler164@... > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: up148 > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 02:25 PM > Subject: {S-Scale List} Re: Wheel Comparison Photos Now In PHOTO Section > > > John, > > Your photos and comparison shots look great but let me ask a dumb question. > If code 87 wheels are already available what is the benefit of code 88 wheel. > Just curious as I don't khow. > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
