Dear Minh,
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:15:11PM +1100, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> I made some changes before updating the Sage website with the changes
> in the above updated BibTeX database. The changes I made include:
>
> * removing the field "howpublished", because that is not necessary in
> a published article.
Sure.
> * spell out the full name of journals to be consistent with the rest
> of the database.
In that case, the bibtex entry was taken straight from MathScinet,
which sounds to me like *the* reference. Shouldn't we try to be
consistent with it? If not just because many of the bibtex entries
will come from there, so it's easier to modify them as little as
possible?
> * add the field "number" and corresponding values. I think this should
> be added whenever possible.
Ok.
> I think the best place to handle such quirks is in Pybtex, as they
> relate more to BibTeX in general rather than specifically to Sage.
Oops, yes of course, I meant Pybtex!
Best,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-de...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
