On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 05:11:13AM -0800, Anne Schilling wrote:
> Following your suggestions I uploaded a new patch which addresses the
> issues of representation and latex methods for spin crystals.
> They now have a new method _repr_ using the signature representation.
> I also implemented a _latex_ method following Nicolas' suggestion.
Cool!
> >This sounds like a good enough incentive to finally get rid of our
> >Sage Days 7 quick hack, and have B.latex use the latex/dot2tex code
> >for graphs, doesn't it?
>
> Could you be more specific of what needs to be done for this?
Just reimplement Crystals.ParentMethods._latex_ to basically do the
above:
G=self.digraph()
G.set_latex_options(format="dot2tex")
return latex(G)
At this occasion, it could provide some more options to
set_latex_options, like the missing edge labels. And possibly the 0
edges going backward and colors on the edges (I don't have the syntax
under hand, but see the e-mail we had exchanged for your affine
crystal); note that this would introduce a dependency on
graphs_color_by_label-nt.patch, but it should be quick to polish and
get it merged when needed.
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
