On Monday, 2 December 2013 09:40:57 UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > > Oddly, knowing that it has been known for two years that this function > returned wrongs results, and that nobody cared enough to fix it is not > exactly a comforting thought. > > Oddly, given that the sage-combinat discussion referred to above was in 2012, I make it one year (definitely odd since two is even). Although I do share your annoyance when things don't work perfectly I don't find this in the least bit odd because trac lists some (sometimes serious) bugs in sage that have been known since 2007. There's even quite a few old graph theory tickets with your name directly attached to them. That's definitely odd!
To be honest Nathan, I also find your penchant for flaming sage-combinat slightly odd but I am sure that there is some rational explanation such as some childhood trauma associated with the counting large primes or the odd order theorem:) I'm sure that "How to make friends and influence people" warns against flaming in cooperative projects as it rarely achieves any of your desired aims, except possibly for short term amusement. Well, oddly, I've never read this book but I think it would be odd if it didn't say something like this. Any way, these odd issues aside of your aside, thanks for fixing the problem! Andrew -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-combinat-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
