On 17 November 2023 04:35:53 GMT, Matthias Koeppe <matthiaskoe...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Or we just let pillow use a system libjpeg if it finds one.
With a dummy package we can have doctests,
with #optional tag, checking that this all works.
>
>On Thursday, November 16, 2023 at 2:38:07 PM UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 16 November 2023 19:33:45 GMT, Michael Orlitzky <mic...@orlitzky.com>
>> wrote:
>> >On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 06:48 -0800, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>> >>
>> >> If we agree to restore jpeg support in Pillow, I have prepared a branch
>> >> that does this for Sage 10.2 (simply suppressing the option
>> "jpeg=disable"):
>> >> https://github.com/egourgoulhon/sage/tree/pillow_jpeg
>> >> and I am happy to submit a PR for this.
>> >>
>> >
>> >That makes pillow link to libjpeg, so we'd also need to package some
>> >incarnation of libjpeg, make it a standard package, write the spkg-
>> >configure script, etc.
>> >
>> >AFAIK the "best" libjpeg is https://libjpeg-turbo.org/, but then we
>> >would also need to package an assembler (nasm or yasm) to build it...
>>
>> let's not make libjpeg a real package.
>> Make it a dummy package, so that libjpeg may be advertised as something to
>> be installed.
>>
>> IIRC the difficulty in packaging jpeg was one of yhe reasons it never made
>> it to a package.
>>
>> >
>>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/7D125D24-7E6D-4F73-AEB9-D99BF94F23EF%40gmail.com.
