On 22 March 2024 23:01:47 GMT, Matthias Koeppe <matthiaskoe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Friday, March 22, 2024 at 3:31:07 PM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>They are not really "tested" - just as much of the rest of Jupiter stuff is
>not tested in our CI.
>
>(installability - yes,
>
>
>The installability of it is exactly what was broken in Sage 10.2.
>We test automatically so that we do not have to wait for users' bug reports.
>
>in a strange non-standard environment,
>
>
>The installability of the package is tested in the relevant environment,
>namely the Sage venv.
>
>I need to ask you to drop these mischaracterizations of the Sage venv as
>something "strange" or "non-standard". There's no technical basis for this,
Of course it is strange and non-standard.
A custom venv, non-standard commands to launch things, pinned to seemingly
random values versions of packages, etc.
>and repeating it is harmful to the project.
>https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/OeN8o14s6Jc
>
>but whether the notebooks actually work, who knows)
>
>
>We know because the reviewer of the upgrade
>ticket https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37478 tested it.
you claimed they are tested by CI, not by humans.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/61B136FB-2D22-4523-A59B-07ED765DF12B%40gmail.com.
