Hi
On 06/09/2008, at 3:21 AM, Simon Beaumont wrote: > > I tried building sage 3.0.1 with David Philps patches - make failed > first with the r build looking for sage (which is in there somewhere R sometimes fails to build if fink is findable. I don't think that is related to any frameworks. > but without packages in place) so I did a make -k and have attached > the install.log - I've got a nice framework python and a half baked > sage and cvxopt build still fails with multiply defined symbols. I hope I mentioned in my previous email that cvxopt will fail unless you patch it. I didn't bother because someone will probably update it to 1.0 anyway, which hsa those multiply defined symbol issues fixed. > All in all this is a show stopper for sage on OS X for me. I'll try > and stitch something together after I've done a vanilla build followed > by the framework one according to David's recipe. I guess I might even > try the 64 bit options one day too. Proprietary systems... pah. That should work fine if you're just playing around. D --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
