Based on my experience with web applications, that's often much harder to do. It'd be great if that was done - relative links would be even better than my solution. But relative links would force a review of all the HTML sage generates, while <base> tags would not. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- [sage-devel] Sage in url prefix Pavel Panchekha
- [sage-devel] Re: Sage in url prefix Timothy Clemans
- [sage-devel] Re: Sage in url prefix Jason Grout
- [sage-devel] Re: Sage in url prefix Pavel Panchekha
- [sage-devel] Re: Sage in url prefix Arnaud Bergeron
- [sage-devel] Re: Sage in url prefix Timothy Clemans
- [sage-devel] Re: Sage in url prefix Pavel Panchekha
- [sage-devel] Re: Sage in url pre... Jason Grout
- [sage-devel] Re: Sage in url... Pavel Panchekha
- [sage-devel] Re: Sage in url... Pavel Panchekha
- [sage-devel] Re: Sage in url... Jason Grout
- [sage-devel] Re: Sage in url... Pavel Panchekha
- [sage-devel] Re: Sage in url... Timothy Clemans
- [sage-devel] Re: Sage in url... William Stein
- [sage-devel] Re: Sage in url... Timothy Clemans
- [sage-devel] Re: Sage in url... mabshoff
- [sage-devel] Re: Sage in url... Pavel Panchekha