On Oct 28, 12:31 am, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> I assume that we would/should add some other marker to the filename to
> identify it as the Sage version of that package rather than the
> vanilla upstream source.
Yeah, that's an issue I probably should have mentioned in my original
email. One solution to that would be to always include the appended
p0 (or whatever) in the version number for Sage versions of packages.
Another would be to use the extension .spkg.tar.bz2.
-Tim Abbott
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
