Hi Burcin,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Burcin Erocal <bur...@erocal.org> wrote:
> 5. Recurse nicely with subscripts.
>
> How is your function different, apart from the fact that you don't
> process suffixes recursively?
In one sentence: the new function returns False for un-told situations
whereas the existing function always returns latex expressions for
ALL names.
This behaviour is bad for function-names as it breaks
function-specific typesetting scheme.
Example: for the function "diff" latex_variable_name will
return \mbox{diff}. This breaks current type-setting
of "diff(f(x),x)" as "{{{\it \partial}}\over{{\it
\partial}\,x}}\,f\left(x\right)"
Similar issue arises for "integrate", "exp", etc.
In fact, I tried to use latex_variable_name for functions and
then ran into trouble!
Cheers,
Golam
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
