Hi Golam,
It seems that you and Jason are getting a firm grip on this, which is
great. Just out of curiosity and my ignorance of the underlying code: Is
your aim to hard-code certain functions, or is your aim to provide the
users with the possibility of defining the latex representation of their
functions? I assume it is the latter, as there is an indefinite number
of possible function names. Could you confirm?
Cheers and good luck,
Stan
Golam Mortuza Hossain wrote:
> Thanks Stan!
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Stan Schymanski <schym...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thus, I think that
>> the problem is not in the definition of the latex reprentations of
>> integral and diff, but in what happens when you define psi(x) =
>> function('psi',x). In my view, this is where the trouble starts.
>>
>
> Yes, you are right, one should start from there and I have already
> got it working for the functions such as
> ----------
> psi(x) = function('psi',x)
> g(x) = exp(psi(x))
> ----
>
> The next type of function names that I am considering are of
> the form
> ----
> psi1(x) = function('psi1',x)
> psi2(x) = function('psi2',x)
> ---
> Above should be easy to implement following the code
> for "SymbolicVariable".
>
> However, as I mentioned earlier, typesetting for "diff(psi(x),x) )"
> is not working even though "psi(x)" is working fine.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Golam
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
