On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:07 PM, ahmet alper parker <aapar...@gmail.com> wrote: > If lisp itself is not perfect, in the long run (say 30 years) it may be > another problem. So why improve lisp first (in example say lisp++)? It seems > if you don't plan and choose the write language, this transition need can > emerge in the future again...
What about Scheme? We can just do *everything* with tail recursion :) -- Carlo Hamalainen http://carlo-hamalainen.net --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
