On Apr 2, 12:07 pm, ahmet alper parker <aapar...@gmail.com> wrote: > If lisp itself is not perfect, in the long run (say 30 years) it may be > another problem. So why improve lisp first (in example say lisp++)?
I suggest to fork python, call it sagepy, and build some lisp++ on top of python's lambda operator. Then, with it's own language, sage is more powerful than anything else out there and attracts developers from all over the world. Consequently, maintinaing a python fork would be very easy because of the expanded developer base. A clear win for everyone. H --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
