Brian Granger wrote: >> The Sage worksheet at >> >> http://abstract.ups.edu/sage-aata.html >> >> contains Sage code that was not written in a notebook. While that >> could be obvious if you actually looked at the file, technically I >> think there is no way to prove just where I wrote it - notebook or >> not. > > Regardless of the how you wrote this, many people would consider your > worksheet a derived work of Sage and thus say that your current > license (CC) violates the GPL.
How is it a derived work of Sage? That argument seems to lead to the conclusion that my C code would be considered a derived work of GCC. That sounds silly to me (but, of course, that doesn't prevent it from possibly being true legally :). Unless, of course, you are actually taking Sage code (i.e., copying a Sage source file) and changing it. That's clearly a derived work. Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
