On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Martin Albrecht<m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de> wrote: > > On Monday 15 June 2009, William Stein wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Martin >> >> Albrecht<m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de> wrote: >> >> sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/singular.pyx" >> >> ********************************************************************** >> >> File >> >> "/Users/was/build/sage-4.0.2.rc0/devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/singular. >> >>pyx ", line 501: >> >> sage: P(2^32-1) >> >> Expected: >> >> -1 >> >> Got: >> >> 4294967295 >> > >> > Is that with my the fix at >> > >> > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/6051/singular_exp_o >> >verflow.patch >> > >> > or without? It seems (since you are using a 32-bit system) all that needs >> > to be done is to fix the doctest. >> >> No, I had not applied your patch. However, I just did, and the above >> issue remains. > > Yes, the issue remains. One should change the doctest, i.e. the behaviour we > expect now is the wrong behaviour.
This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6300 a blocker for sage-4.0.2. William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
