>> That is on old issue: L.primes_above(6) tries to sort the primes but >> there are tie-break situations where the order is not determined; >> and >> pari's output is often different on 32-or 64-bit machines. Unless >> someone can come up with a reliable way of sorting primes in a number >> field (currently "sorted by residue degree first, then by >> underlying prime (or equivalently, by norm).") this doctest >> should be changed so as not to depend on the order.
I even changed the doctest, thinking you had made this unique. Let's just verify the sorted list is correct, and not worry about the ordering. Nick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
