Build failed for intel macbook 10.4.11

Should I post the full log somewhere? Here is the tail:


/Users/davidjoyner/sagefiles/sage-4.1.alpha0/local/include/python2.5 -c
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c -o
build/temp.macosx-10.3-i386-2.5/sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.o -w
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c:7:32: error: mach/shared_region.h: No such
file or directory
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c: In function ‘shared_region_size’:
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c:34: error: ‘SHARED_REGION_SIZE_PPC’
undeclared (first use in this function)
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c:34: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
reported only once
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c:34: error: for each function it appears in.)
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c:36: error: ‘SHARED_REGION_SIZE_PPC64’
undeclared (first use in this function)
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c:38: error: ‘SHARED_REGION_SIZE_I386’
undeclared (first use in this function)
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c:40: error: ‘SHARED_REGION_SIZE_X86_64’
undeclared (first use in this function)
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c: In function ‘in_shared_region’:
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c:48: error: ‘SHARED_REGION_BASE_PPC’
undeclared (first use in this function)
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c:49: error: ‘SHARED_REGION_SIZE_PPC’
undeclared (first use in this function)
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c:54: error: ‘SHARED_REGION_BASE_PPC64’
undeclared (first use in this function)
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c:55: error: ‘SHARED_REGION_SIZE_PPC64’
undeclared (first use in this function)
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c:60: error: ‘SHARED_REGION_BASE_I386’
undeclared (first use in this function)
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c:61: error: ‘SHARED_REGION_SIZE_I386’
undeclared (first use in this function)
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c:66: error: ‘SHARED_REGION_BASE_X86_64’
undeclared (first use in this function)
sage/misc/darwin_memory_usage.c:67: error: ‘SHARED_REGION_SIZE_X86_64’
undeclared (first use in this function)
error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1
sage: There was an error installing modified sage library code.



On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Robert Miller <rlmills...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> This is the first release of the new cycle, and I've agreed to step in
> and co-chair the release with Tom. The source tarball and sage.math
> binary are available:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.alpha0.tar
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.alpha0-sage.math-only-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz
>
> This is the first development release in which the new merge tools
> were used by people other than the authors. Several doctests fail on
> sage.math:
>
>        sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/graphs/graph.py # 25 doctests
> failed
>        sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/databases/database.py # 20
> doctests failed
>        sage -t  devel/sage-main/sage/geometry/polyhedra.py # 1
> doctests failed
>
> These are all due to the removal of graph_isom.pyx, and I will be
> posting a patch to fix this shortly, at #6394. I think that there was
> no way to avoid these failures, since the only way to expose them was
> to remove the code, rebuild entirely from scratch, and then run the
> tests.
>
> This release does not include any tickets involving spkg's. I will
> make this the main focus of alpha1, which should drop before Friday.
>
> Each of the following tickets were rejected by the merge scripts, but
> unfortunately the failures are not available at this time (this is due
> to human error on my part). If you are involved with one of them, you
> are encouraged to try applying the patches to 4.1.alpha0 and see why/
> if they failed. Tom and I will eventually do this, but it would be
> helpful for people involved in the ticket to get things started:
>
> 6196
> 5481
> 6276
> 4712
> 5517
> 5991
> 6164
> 6200
> 5902
> 6269
>
> Other easy ways to save release managers time, resulting in more
> frequent releases and shorter wait times to get your code merged:
>
> * Please include the trac number in each commit message if possible.
> * Please make sure Author and Reviewer fields are set, when changing
> the ticket status to "positive review." Since these are used in
> generating release notes, please use full names.
> * Please adhere to the "trac_####-description.patch" filename format
> when creating patch files.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Robert Miller (and Tom Boothby)
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to