On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Dr. David Kirkby<david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: > > Robert Miller wrote: >> This is the first release of the new cycle, and I've agreed to step in >> and co-chair the release with Tom. The source tarball and sage.math >> binary are available: >> >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.alpha0.tar >> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.alpha0-sage.math-only-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz >> >> This is the first development release in which the new merge tools >> were used by people other than the authors. Several doctests fail on >> sage.math: >> >> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/graphs/graph.py # 25 doctests >> failed >> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/databases/database.py # 20 >> doctests failed >> sage -t devel/sage-main/sage/geometry/polyhedra.py # 1 >> doctests failed >> >> These are all due to the removal of graph_isom.pyx, and I will be >> posting a patch to fix this shortly, at #6394. I think that there was >> no way to avoid these failures, since the only way to expose them was >> to remove the code, rebuild entirely from scratch, and then run the >> tests. >> >> This release does not include any tickets involving spkg's. I will >> make this the main focus of alpha1, which should drop before Friday. >> >> Each of the following tickets were rejected by the merge scripts, but >> unfortunately the failures are not available at this time (this is due >> to human error on my part). If you are involved with one of them, you >> are encouraged to try applying the patches to 4.1.alpha0 and see why/ >> if they failed. Tom and I will eventually do this, but it would be >> helpful for people involved in the ticket to get things started: >> >> 6196 >> 5481 >> 6276 > > I'd like to know why 6276 failed. It seemed pretty simple, and should > have only had an effect on Solaris. > > import shutil > if os.uname()[0] == 'SunOS': > shutil.copy2('patches/mmsearch-with-temp-Solaris-fix.c','src/tune/blas/gemm/mmsearch.c') > > > 6380 has positive review too, but that does not appear to have been > listed as either failing, nor included.
Robert was in error when he reported that those tickets failed. I didn't apply anything to the scripts repo, or anything with a spkg. Also, a number of tickets appeared in report 11 during the time between me pulling down the patches and getting them applied / tested. #6380 will go in for alpha2, which will be rc1 if Robert manages to get Mike Hansen's Python 2.6 spkg in. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
