Maurizio wrote: > My 2 cents here: > why do we keep the "numerical solve" function with a completely > different name? I know that "find_root" or "roots" make sense, but > wouldn't just be much better to name them "solve_numerical", or > anything like putting a postfix after the word "solve"? > I don't know whether this is generally a good thing to do, but I just > keep finding it so easy if I do "solve[Tab]" so that ALL the functions > related to solving equations are shown (both exact and numerical)
Great idea. We can make an alias: solve_numerical=find_root Does find_root take general symbolic expressions (i.e., x==x^2)? Jason -- Jason Grout --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
