> We might also have an option for "fixed in our version", as many times > we will patch an spkg and simultaneously report it upstream. When we > eventually get the upstream fix in an update, we delete our patch. >
In other words, is this preferred way to fix broken Maxima commands? 1. Fix in maxima.spkg 2. Add test that the fixed spkg is used. I am asking because of work on trac http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7325 (fixed in CVS Maxima few days ago). I fixed Maxima part in python code in the patch submitted to this trac, which seems to be not accepted. And what about http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6479 where I fixed maxima commands ic2 and bc2 directly in Python code (lines 322-328 and 341--346). Should this ticket been reopened and ic2, bc2 fixed as described above? Robert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
