On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 04:39:17PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2009, at 8:42 AM, Christopher Olah wrote:
>
> >> So it sounds like nothing has changed for us? The conditions about
> >> New
> >> York were what prevented GPL compliance before, I thought, and that
> >> hasn't changed either.
> >
> > It seems to me that it might be worth writing to them... I wonder if
> > they know how problematic their terms are for integration in other
> > projects?
>
> It would still probably be worth providing an interface, even if we
> don't ship it, e.g. as an option to graph.plot(). We already have
Yup, that's the purpose of:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7004
Rob Beezer: any chances for you to finalize it before it rots away?
(and yes, it would be great if graphviz was GPL-compatible).
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
