Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Minh Nguyen <nguyenmi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi David,

On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
<david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote:

<SNIP>

It needs reviewing, and I'd appreciate if a few people could have a
look at
it.

http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7818
I have started building Sage 4.3.1.alpha1 with the updated sage-env on
about half a dozen machines. I'll report the test results later on
when all build/doctests are done.

I build on the virtualbox farm, and the results are in

http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/farm/out/4.3.1.alpha0/

in case you want to look. That "alpha0" is your alpha1, I think.

William

Thank you.

The changes introduced are deliberately very small - which is why I
think the file is safe.

Unfortunately, given the file sage-env has no "echo" statements, it's
hard to know exactly what sage-env has done, compared to what would have
been done had the modified script not been used. (But of course if it
did have echo statements, it would cause an annoyance when starting Sage).

The new environment variables the modified sage-env sets (CFLAG64,
SHARED_LIBRARY_EXTENSION, SONAME_FLAG, WHOLE_ARCHIVE_FLAG etc) are not
displayed, as nothing in Sage uses them. So again, its hard to determine
from those builds any changes. One can only see what is happening when
on tries to display the variables.

So I can't tell an awful lot from those, other than to say:

* The updated 'sage-env' does not appear to break on any of your builds
or mine.

* Testing on my own SPARC show sage-env inject the right compiler option
(-m64) when SAGE64=yes.

* Testing on my own HP-UX shows sage-env injects the right compiler
option (+DA2.0W) when SAGE64=yes.

Could #7818 get a positive review, be dropped into alpha2, and let Jaap
Spies get on with the port to Open Solaris? I very much doubt most
people will notice any difference whatsoever, but it will make the
Solaris port a lot easier, and allow for some spkg-install files to be
cleaned up.



Yes, please! I can give it a positive review anyway :).

Jaap


Dave



-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to