On 26 Mai, 20:25, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu>
wrote:
> On May 26, 2010, at 11:13 AM, leif wrote:
> > In the long term, many packages should be moved from the main tarball/
> > made prerequisites, such that you only have to download them if you
> > really need them.
>
> One of the points of Sage was that you didn't need to worry about  
> manually installing dependancies, just download the tarbal and build  
> (and it all just works).

Waiting for Debian et al. packages that manage that... (a pseudo
dependency package could suffice in the first place).

Or a Sage "pre-install" package that downloads missing (perhaps
sourrce) packages (and applies necessary patches) [and builds them,
then continuing with Sage installation].

> Of course, with Windows we're already down  
> that slope some, as cygwin is a "dependancy" (though one could imagine  
> shipping a cygwin+sage binary that just requires double clicking and  
> installs like any other standard MS app).

+1 (and remove Cephes from the source tarball :)

I wonder if a M$ user should be required to install Cygwin and compile
Sage at all... ;-)

-Leif

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to