On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:24 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Pablo De Napoli <pden...@gmail.com> wrote: >> No, my point is that gfortran is not distributed with sage in source form. >> I think that we should either >> '- include gfortran in source form in sage distribution > > Including gfortran or g95 in source form is not realistic, as you'll > discover if you spend a few weeks trying... > >> - split the binary files in a separated file >> otherwise it is not a source distribution. >> )but a mix of a source and a binary one. This could even violate the GPL >> (under which gfortran is distributed) siince we are distributing the >> binaries but not the sources. > > Seriously?
well not . gfortran sources are available on the internet. But yes if you read the text of the GPL literally. (nobody will do this, I hope) -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
