Hi, > Perhaps we should make my fork the "official" sage-mode repository so that > Nick no longer has to be involved.
I've write (maybe even admin) access on Nick's repo I'm pretty sure he will agree to give your the same right. So I don't really see the point of having a new fork. It will just add some confusion, or am I missing something ? > >> FWIW, I've been meaning to make an spkg with my changes (adding AUCTeX > >> support for SageTeX). It would also include customization of the preamble > >> and possibly a fix for this problem. > > > > I'm not sure what you mean by "include customization of the preamble" but > > the > > patch I submitted was exactly for that purpose. So the LaTeX preamble should > > now be fully customizable in emacs customization menus. What I would like to > > have is to include Sage's "latex.extra_preamble()" to emacs > > preamble. Unfortunately I don't know how to get this from emacs. > > Sorry, I meant that it includes your changes in this area. When did you made your "fork" ? Isn't your patch already there ? Florent -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
