On 29 April 2012 15:35, David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote:
> A few ideas that might work, are below. I would add, I'm not > suggesting they are all very good (in particular 1 and 4 are a bit > excessive), but I mention them anyway. Sorry, it was 2 and 4 which I feel are going too far. This is going ta bit too far, but I mention it for completeness. > 2) Finding sections of code which are not tested, and depreciating > them, unless someone writes the doctests, in which case the > depreciation can be removed. Same with this. > 4) Finding individuals that have written code that is not tested, and > not merging any more patches from them unless they first add tests to > the ALL code they have already written. But I feel the other 5 have some merrit, and all are at least worth of discussion. Dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
