On 29 April 2012 18:00, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sunday, April 29, 2012, David Kirkby wrote:
>> >> Perhaps you would agree to the number 5 I suggested earlier. >> >> 5) Finding individuals that have written code that is not tested, and >> not merging any more patches from them unless they first add tests to >> a number (say 5) tests for all the code they have written which is >> untested. >> > > I am opposed to anything that restricts an author from including good new up > to snuff code in Sage based on any properties ir behaviour of said author. Would you be opposed to insisting someone write one doctest for previous code they have written, for every new patch they want merged? I originally said 5, but would you find 1 acceptable? Dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
