On Friday, June 21, 2013 10:43:13 PM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > I think a decorator like this makes the code unreadable, and if it can > be avoided then it should be avoided.
+1 My opinion is very close to the one of Dima in this thread. I believe we should avoid to spread such decorator in the Sage code base. Results of computations made by FindStat shoud not depend on the number of combinatorial map decorators that are in the Sage code. There might be some interesting results that FindStat could find but does not just because there is no decorators for it. In the long term, the actual design tends to add decorators to more and more methods in Sage to improve FindStat and I do not agree with this. I think FindStat should return the best results possible no matter the presence/absence of decorators. Sébastien -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
