2014-11-26 16:29 GMT+01:00 Jakob Kroeker <kroe...@uni-math.gwdg.de>: > > Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014 14:47:29 UTC+1 schrieb Viviane Pons: > > > I would be in favour of this: having "guidelines" and not an enforced code. >> > > ++ > > ...that would require another voting which invalidates the previous one... > > > Probably, but let's not rush into anything!! We've seen the consequence of that. I agree that the vote was a bit early but I guess William just did as he thought was best, he wasn't trying to enforce anything but maybe just to settle the point. He could not predict the direction of the vote, it was a close call.
> Jakob > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
