On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Viviane Pons <vivianep...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2014-11-26 16:29 GMT+01:00 Jakob Kroeker <kroe...@uni-math.gwdg.de>: >> >> >> Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014 14:47:29 UTC+1 schrieb Viviane Pons: >> >> >>> I would be in favour of this: having "guidelines" and not an enforced >>> code. >> >> >> ++ >> >> ...that would require another voting which invalidates the previous one... >> >> > Probably, but let's not rush into anything!! We've seen the consequence of > that. I agree that the vote was a bit early but I guess William just did as > he thought was best, he wasn't trying to enforce anything but maybe just to > settle the point. He could not predict the direction of the vote, it was a > close call.
So you don't have to guess, I agree with the above "guesses" about what I thought. I also agree with Volker's statement: "I could have voted, but I didn't. Mostly because I think that the whole discussion was more useful than a text tucked away on the web page when it comes to reminding everyone to stay civil. So I would have counted either outcome as a win..." William -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
